Inventory Problems at Nike
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : OPER030
Case Length : 10 Pages
Period : 1991 - 2003
Organization : Nike
Pub Date : 2004
Teaching Note : Available
Countries : USA
Industry : Sports & Apparel
To download Inventory Problems at Nike case study
(Case Code: OPER030) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 +Shipping & Handling Charges extra
» Operations Case Studies
» Case Studies Collection
» ICMR HOME
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
Excerpts
New System's Teething Troubles
Nike built its original demand management system in the mid-1980s, as it moved
towards becoming the number one sports shoes retailer in the world. During that
period, Nike had also tremendously increased the number of its manufacturing
units around the world. The demand management system was designed and
implemented by over one hundred information specialists within the company. This
system was designed to run the Futures program introduced by Nike in the 1970s,
which was supposed to help Nike manage inventory more effectively. Under this
system, Nike's retail partners placed orders with the company six months before
the required delivery date. These orders were then forwarded to the
manufacturing units around the world...
|
|
The Consequences of the Breakdown
The breakdown of the new system had several adverse consequences on Nike. It
upset the supply chain system and caused the company to be bogged down by a
large number of unpopular models, while not having enough of the popular
ones. Not being able to cater to the market demands, Nike's reputation
suffered and it lost considerable market share to rivals like New Balance
and Reebok. New Balance especially gained on Nike in market share...
|
Conclusion
Both, Nike and i2 came out the worse for the supply chain failure.
Analysts felt that, the negative publicity and the washing of dirty
linen in public affected both companies even more adversely than the
monetary losses and the production complications. However, Nike
continued to work with i2 on the five-year long project and by the end
of 2003 (the project was to end in mid-2004), had made considerable
progress. In September 2003, the company announced that its ability to
closely monitor the movement of goods from raw materials through
factories to retailers was finally paying off... |
Exhibits
Exhibit-I: The Swoosh Symbol
Exhibit-II: Income Statement (All Numbers in Thousands of Dollars)
Exhibit-III: Market Share of Major Sports Goods Manufacturers in the First
Quarters of 1999 and 2000
|
|